London, 23 March, 1871.Dear Paul,

I enclose Seraillier’s declaration in the “Courrier de l’Europe, 18 March, 1871”Die Beilage ist überliefert: [Gez.:] A. Serrailler: Monsieur le Rédacteur ... . In: Courrier de l'Europe. London. Nr. 1620, 18. März 1871. S. 172, Sp. 1–2. Digitalisat siehe hier. —(this French paper is published at London) in regard to the impudent mystification of the Paris-Journal of March 14, of which you are probably aware.

The following is published in the “Times” of 22nd March 1871 under the title

“The International Association: M. Karl Marx asks us to contradict the statement contained in a letter published by us in the 16th of March, from our Paris correspondentThe State of Paris. In: The Times. London. Nr. 27012, 16. März 1871. S. 10., that ‘Karl Marx has written a letter to one of his principal affiliés in Paris, stating that he is not satisfied with the attitude which the members of that society have taken up in that city, that they violate the Statutes of the Association in dabbling in politics, that they disorganise labour instead of organising it etc.’ M. Karl Marx says this statement has evidently been taken from the Paris-Journal of the 14th of MarchLe Grand Chef de l'Internationale. In: Paris-Journal. Paris. Nr. 71, 14. März 1871. S. 1., where also the publication in full of the pretended letter is promised, and that the Paris-Journal of the 19th of March contains a letterLettre du Grand Chef de l'Internationale. In: Paris-Journal. Paris. Nr. 76, 19. März 1871. S. 1. dated London, February 28, 1871, purporting to be signed by him, which letter M. Marx declares is from beginning to end an impudent forgery.”

I come now to the second trick of that dirty Parisian reactxnx reactionary press. When we were informed of the pretended exclusion of the German “Internationals” by the Paris “Internationals”, we wrote to the “frères et amis” at Paris, who replied that this story was nothing but an invention of the Paris press scum. Meanwhile, the news false news spread like wildfire through the London press which indulged in long leaders upon that pleasant event proving at the same time the decomposition of the International and the incorrigible perversion of the Paris workmen.

In to-days’ Times (23 March, 1871.) the following declaration of the General Council is publishedJ. George Eccarius: The Anti-German League of Paris. In: The Times. London. Nr. 27018, 23. März 1871. S. 5.:

“The Anti-German Ligue of Paris.“To the Editor of the Times.

Sir,

A statement has gone the round of the English press that the Paris members of the International Working Men’s Association had in so far joined the so-called Anti-German League as to declare all Germans to be henceforth excluded from our association.

This statement is the very reverse of fact. Neither the Federal Council of our association in Paris, nor any of the Paris sections represented by that council, have ever passed any such resolution. The so-called Anti-German League, as far as it exists at all, is the exclusive work of the upper and middle classes; it was started by the Jockey Club, and kept up by the adhesions of the Academy, of the Stock Exchange, of some bankers and manufacturers etc. The working-classes have nothing whatever to do with it.

The object of these calumnies is evident. A short time before the outbreak of the late war the International was made the general scape-goat for all untoward events. This is now repeated over again. While the Swiss and Prussian press accuse it of having created the late outrage upon Germans in ZürichSiehe die ausführliche Erl. in D (S. 184 Anm. 8). , French papers, such as the Courrier de Lyon, le Courrier de la Gironde, la Liberté etc., tell of certain secret meetings of Internationals having been held at Geneva and Bern, the Prussian ambassador in the chair, in which meetings a plan was concocted to hand over Lyons to the united Prussians and Internationals for the sake of common plunder.

By order of the General Council of the International Working Men’s Association

London, March 22. J. G. Eccarius, General Secretary.”

____________________

I have to-day still so many letters to write that I must shut up. Tell Laura that I was greatly delighted with her letterNicht überlieferter Brief von Laura Lafargue an Marx, geschrieben vor dem 23. März 1871..

YoursK. Marx.

Votre lettre à Jenny vient d’arriver.Es könnte sich handeln um: Paul Lafargue an Jenny Marx, 28. Februar 1871. Der Brief, der am 1. März geschrieben sein dürfte, ist gedruckt in: Les Filles de Karl Marx (1979). S. 133–135. Ce n’est pas mon ardeur juvénile, comme vous le croyez, ce sont des manifestes, publiés par le Conseil Fédéral de Paris pendant la guerreSiehe die ausführliche Erl. in D (S. 184 Anm. 9)., et qui nous ont été communiqués officiellement, qui faisaient croire le General Council dans la possibilité d’une telle bêtise que l’exclusion des Internationaux allemands par les Intern. parisiens! J’ai aujourd’hui envoyé au Volksstaat à LeipzigSiehe die ausführliche Erl. in D (S. 184 Anm. 10). (le journal de Liebknecht) et au Zukunft à BerlinSiehe die ausführliche Erl. in D (S. 184 Anm. 11); MEGA I/22. S. 5/6; 779/780. Siehe S. L. Borkheim an Marx, 27.3.1871.. (organe du Dr. Jacoby) une déclaration sur les phantaisies du Paris-Journal et la soi-disant exclusion des Internationaux Allemands par les Parisiens, qui xxxx xxxxx xx xxxxxx a fait beaucoup de bruit dans la «bonne presse» allemande. J’ai fini cette déclaration par ces mots:

«Xx C’est dans la nature des choses que les grands dignitaires et les classes dominantes de la vieille société, qui ne xxxxxx xxxxxx sauraient perpétuer leur pouvoir et l’exploitation des masses productives que par le moyen des antagonismes et des luttes x nationaux, traitent l’Association Internationale des Travailleurs comme l’ennemi commun.».