<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="M0000069">
   <teiHeader>
      <fileDesc>
         <titleStmt>
            <title>
               <idno>65</idno>Karl Kaub an Familie Marx in London. Paris, Samstag, 17. März
                    1866</title>
         </titleStmt><editionStmt><p/></editionStmt>
         
         <publicationStmt><publisher><ref target="https://www.bbaw.de">Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften</ref></publisher><pubPlace ref="https://www.geonames.org/2950159">Berlin</pubPlace><availability><licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)</licence></availability><idno type="URLWeb">https://megadigital.bbaw.de/</idno><idno type="URLXML">https://megadigital.bbaw.de/.xml</idno></publicationStmt>
         <sourceDesc>
            <msDesc rend="manuscript">
               <msIdentifier>
                  <institution>IISG</institution>
                  <collection>Marx-Engels-Nachlass</collection>
                  <idno>
                     <idno type="shelfmark">D 2619/D V 44. Fotosign. 9577a–b</idno>
                  </idno>
               </msIdentifier>
               <physDesc>
                  <p>Der Brief besteht aus einem Bogen dünnem, weißem Papier im Format
                            412 × 266 mm. Kaub hat die erste und dritte Seite vollständig
                            beschrieben, die zweite und vierte Seite sind leer. Schreibmaterial:
                            schwarze Tinte. </p>
                  <p>Von unbekannter Hand: Nummerierung des Briefes: „2“ mit Bleistift auf der
                            ersten Seite oben in der Mitte; Vermerk mit schwarzer Tinte „Mars
                            17/66“, auf der vierten Seite unten rechts quer geschrieben.</p>
                  <p>Die Schreibweise wurde zurückhaltend korrigiert, die Eingriffe sind
                            ausgewiesen.</p>
               </physDesc>
               <additional>
                  <listBibl>
                     <bibl>RGASPI f. 1 op. 5 d. 1646</bibl>
                  </listBibl>
               </additional>
            </msDesc>
         </sourceDesc>
      </fileDesc>
      <profileDesc><textClass><keywords><term>letter</term></keywords></textClass>
         <correspDesc>
            <correspAction type="sent">
               <persName ref="https://megadigital.bbaw.de/M0007622 1014674">Karl Kaub</persName>
               <placeName ref="https://megadigital.bbaw.de/M0001619 http://www.geonames.org/2988507">Paris</placeName>
               <date when="1866-03-17"/>
            </correspAction>
            <correspAction type="received">
               <persName ref="https://megadigital.bbaw.de/M0001634 http://d-nb.info/gnd/11857857X">Marx, Familie (-)</persName>
               <placeName ref="https://megadigital.bbaw.de/M0004412 http://www.geonames.org/2643743">London</placeName>
            </correspAction>
            <correspContext>
               <ref type="prev" target="https://megadigital.bbaw.de/M0004875"/>
            </correspContext>
            <note>Kaub beantwortet, wie aus dem Brief zu ersehen ist, einen nicht überlieferten
                    Brief, vermutlich von Jenny Marx, geschrieben vor dem 17. März 1866 (<ref target="https://megadigital.bbaw.de/M0004875">J. Marx an K. Kaub, vor 17.3.1866</ref>).</note>
         </correspDesc>
         <textClass>
            <keywords>
               <term key="M0002748">„Das Kapital“ (Arbeit an Manuskripten,
                        Veröffentlichung)</term>
               <term key="M0004068">Frankreich</term>
               <term key="M0004027">Naturwissenschaften</term>
            </keywords>
         </textClass>
      </profileDesc>
      
   </teiHeader>
   <text><body>
         <div type="writingSession">
            <opener>
               <dateline>
                  <pb/> Paris, Mars 17/1866</dateline>
               <address>
                  <addrLine>33, Rue des trois Couronnes, du Temple <lb/>
                  </addrLine>
               </address>
               <salute>Dears, all of you</salute>
            </opener>
            <p>It was surely the most brilliant idea, <ref xml:id="d3f835a9-b2fd-4a77-b835-a9b2fd1a77b8" corresp="#c9d6acfe-aa48-4cb7-96ac-feaa48bcb7c0" type="editorialNote">father
                            Mohr</ref><note xml:id="c9d6acfe-aa48-4cb7-96ac-feaa48bcb7c0" corresp="#d3f835a9-b2fd-4a77-b835-a9b2fd1a77b8" type="editorial">
                     <persName ref="https://megadigital.bbaw.de/M0001374 http://d-nb.info/gnd/118578537">Karl Marx</persName>.</note> ever had,
                    when he got good <ref xml:id="fff1986f-f197-4a32-b198-6ff197aa320d" corresp="#c2829652-1888-4ceb-8296-5218888ceb1a" type="editorialNote">Jenny</ref><note xml:id="c2829652-1888-4ceb-8296-5218888ceb1a" corresp="#fff1986f-f197-4a32-b198-6ff197aa320d" type="editorial">
                     <persName ref="https://megadigital.bbaw.de/M0008235  http://d-nb.info/gnd/118728997">Jenny Marx (Tochter)</persName>.
                        </note> to make me have those long expected and often thought of,
                    portraits. I now, without the slightest hesitation—boldly I say: you are the
                    most pathetical wordkeepers, this <expan>wre<ex>t</ex>ched</expan> world has
                    ever borne. Indeed, I was so thoroughly pleased, when I saw your dear little
                    heads dive out of <ref xml:id="c6138ecd-8660-4433-938e-cd866044333e" corresp="#ef954bb4-ead8-4ffb-954b-b4ead8fffb5e" type="editorialNote">your letter,</ref><note xml:id="ef954bb4-ead8-4ffb-954b-b4ead8fffb5e" corresp="#c6138ecd-8660-4433-938e-cd866044333e" type="editorial">Der Brief konnte nicht ermittelt
                        werden.</note> that—what do you think? that I could not help heartily
                    kissing them, without exception, and—niether of you even plushed. Should
                    however, any one of you feel vexed, at so much of a stranger’s daring, there
                    will be no other way, of taking revenge, at this my criminal action, but to do
                    the same to mine, if it should happen to be found still in that rich collection,
                    among the number of your friends; do it with as angry looks as possibly you
                    may—and never tell me of it (!)</p>
            <p>
               <ref xml:id="dfd3cf84-389d-40b3-93cf-84389db0b35e" corresp="#dd58a797-6b04-4483-98a7-976b042483be" type="editorialNote">I was very deeply affected to hear, that you had
                            sickness and sorrow again reigning in your house,</ref><note xml:id="dd58a797-6b04-4483-98a7-976b042483be" corresp="#dfd3cf84-389d-40b3-93cf-84389db0b35e" type="editorial">Seit Ende Januar litt Marx
                            an Furunkulose.</note> and even more so as you did have before. I
                    know, that poor Mohr has not the time now to be ill and keep his sheets. How
                    much this very critical position, he of needs must have found himself to be
                    surprised by this new “fléau” in, must have contributed to give you number of
                    anxieties, I fully can appreciate. Mohr is, I often had occasion to convince me
                    of, by nature of an exellent disposition and of a most brillant humour, as long
                    as he is passably well, and able to smoke his pipe in peace, but like the rest
                    of us, being ill, he is likely to have his days, when he gets awful out of time.
                    If one, like him, has all his lifetime struggled and made sail for one thing,
                    has, with all his work and toil, at last reached close his end—the land in
                    sight, he drops his anchor—and finds his tackle short and going back to sea
                    again, he can not well help knitting his brows, and growing damned wild. <ref xml:id="de8579f1-7e89-4fb2-8579-f17e89dfb2ee" corresp="#e5381fa8-402b-458a-b81f-a8402b758ac1" type="editorialNote">His work,</ref><note xml:id="e5381fa8-402b-458a-b81f-a8402b758ac1" corresp="#de8579f1-7e89-4fb2-8579-f17e89dfb2ee" type="editorial">Gemeint ist hier <bibl corresp="https://megadigital.bbaw.de/PT9GISVC">Karl Marx: Das Kapital</bibl>; siehe
                                <ref target="https://megadigital.bbaw.de/M0000007/a85fd331-e369-4613-bae5-8b4731d7edc3">Erl. zu
                                Marx an J. Ph. Becker, zw. 9. u. 15.1.1866.</ref>
                     
                     
                     
                  </note>
                    so eagerly expected by all his friends, that will have cost him so many nights
                    rests, and which, to my <expan>beli<ex>e</ex>ve</expan>, in a great measure is
                    the cause of his continued ake and lingering health, by depriving him of all
                    necessary rest and distraction, I hope, as earnestly as one can hope, that is
                    fully aware of its importance, and bears his friendship streight at heart—will
                    find its completion, with natur’s resurrection—the all invigorating spring! I am
                    convinced that this weight, once off his mind, he will become another man, he
                    will be merry as he was before, and joy and happiness will enter streight at all
                    your doors again. If then, you careful keep the windows shut, you will find your
                    rooms too small, to hold it all, and Mohr will be obliged to take the sails and
                    come over to me, to Paris, and spend a happy month with me. If my rustic
                    habitation, will then be good enough, he shall be heartily welcome.</p>
            <p>We had a most wretched winter here. The weather was as changeable and
                            <expan>unhea<ex>l</ex>thy</expan> as ever I had seen in London. Raining,
                    hot and cold were dayly changing twice and more than twice. The number of ills
                    is greater as ever has been seen before, the hospitals are crowded and burrial
                    undertaking is the best business out. Combined with that, things have been
                    generally very dull here, and living has attained a higher price, as I knew it
                    to have been at London, at the time I left.</p>
            <p>I for my own part, have still kept very well, and the numberless complaints, I
                    was subjected to, in foggy London, are all gone by. I think if I had stood
                    another year or two on Englands smoky shores, I should have kicked the bucket
                    like a man. I think one ought not to do so any sooner than he can help. </p>
            <p>
               <pb/> Our business goes on now, as well as can be expected under such unfavorable
                    circumstances, as than we had had to begin in. We have plenty of work, even so
                    much, that we are almost smothered with it. The only great misfortune in the
                    matter is, that we have not sufficiently <hi rendition="#u">tin</hi> to make it
                    go and role, and make it worth our’s while. As things are now, we have about 35
                    or 40,000 Fr. in the concern. If we wanted to go on, any way favourably, we
                    ought now at least to have another 800 or 1000 <unclear reason="covered" cert="high">£</unclear> to put in to it. As it were, we are dependent of a
                    multitude of unfavourable circumstances, of different individuals etc. we might
                    all free ourselfs without delay. There has been offerd to us, for example, the
                    execution of <unclear reason="illegible" cert="high">censoring</unclear> the
                    whole materials of a large manufactury—a work amounting to more than 100,000 Fr.
                    There might be 25,000 Fr. got out of it in considerably less than a year, and
                    the work we have, carried on at the same time. But as we are <hi rendition="#u">almost</hi> pennyless—the whole of what little we have, all laid out, and
                    not by far enough—there is not to be thought of such an undertaking, the job
                    will pass our noses clean, although the preference would have been given to us,
                    had we been able to execute it without the help of any one. It will fall to the
                    lot of one that has got tin enough. However I do not complain, as I know it
                    would be of no use. <ref xml:id="b271d577-2690-4892-b1d5-772690289256" corresp="#aa04c8ca-c971-4089-84c8-cac9718089c5" type="editorialNote">Rothchild, they say, was once on
                                    <expan>bo<ex>a</ex>rd</expan> of one of the Rhin-steamers, when
                            a pickpocket tried to rob the poor Baron. His friend, who stood by,
                            seeing it, laid hand on the fellow, and wanted, to have him locked up.
                            “Never mind” said Rothchild “let the chap loose, we too have begun in so
                            small a way.”</ref><note xml:id="aa04c8ca-c971-4089-84c8-cac9718089c5" corresp="#b271d577-2690-4892-b1d5-772690289256" type="editorial">Es handelt sich um eine bekannte Anekdote. Gemeint sind hier
                            vermutlich, auch wegen des im Brief genannten österreichischen Militärs
                                <persName ref="https://megadigital.bbaw.de/M0002693 http://d-nb.info/gnd/118716042">Ludwig Freiherr von
                            Gablenz</persName>, die <persName ref="https://megadigital.bbaw.de/M0002767">Wiener
                                Rothschilds</persName>, somit entweder <persName ref="https://megadigital.bbaw.de/M0004276 http://d-nb.info/gnd/116641606">Anselm Salomon Freiherr von Rothschild</persName> oder noch sein
                            Vater, <persName ref="https://megadigital.bbaw.de/M0002195 http://d-nb.info/gnd/116641924">Salomon Meyer Freiherr von
                                Rothschild</persName>. </note>—So so. We are but little thiefs
                    now, and will have a damned hard pull to get on, but if we but have a little
                    chance—we may. There is no possibility of getting out of it now! We either must
                    swimm or drown. The only thing, that grieves me much, is, that before we get out
                    of the deepest mud—if out we get at all—those few good years, I have still
                    before me, will have gone by, and things which might have been done perhaps even
                    now, although it is already late, will be to late for ever.</p>
            <p>To another picture!<persName ref="https://megadigital.bbaw.de/M0007622 1014674"> I</persName> dare not
                    neglect, my dear Marx, to tell you of a thing which might perhaps at a very
                    early period, enter so extensivly into the composure of our present society,
                    that this our society would cease to resemble itself. The period of steam will
                    be at its end. A Frenchman, of the name of <persName ref="https://megadigital.bbaw.de/M0004465">Rebour</persName>, and whose <expan>acqu<ex>a</ex>inta</expan>
               <ex>n</ex>ce
                    I had the pleasure of making, has lately modified an invention, he has already
                    tried before a numerous public of <expan>s<ex>c</ex>ientific</expan> men in
                    1853, in Russia, Amerika and lastly in England, which will be able of
                    propounding any railway train or doing any kind of work, steam engines are doing
                    now, without any power, but its <hi rendition="#u">own weight</hi> as a moteur.
                    Do not think I am out of mind. In 53 already, the future consequences of such an
                    invention have been so thoroughly understood in London, at a Banquet given to
                        M. <persName ref="https://megadigital.bbaw.de/M0004465">Rebour</persName> at Sablonnière-Hôtel,
                    Leicester Square, that high placed men thought wise to poison the man, which
                    they affected by presenting him a slize of cake, where a laurel &amp; a rose
                    were laid on. However he survived. To day, he is associated with <ref xml:id="dd02be62-d893-489d-82be-62d893d89d26" corresp="#b55fe148-9c6b-44d2-9fe1-489c6bb4d208" type="editorialNote">Baron <persName ref="https://megadigital.bbaw.de/M0004276 http://d-nb.info/gnd/116641606">Rothchild</persName>
                  </ref><note xml:id="b55fe148-9c6b-44d2-9fe1-489c6bb4d208" corresp="#dd02be62-d893-489d-82be-62d893d89d26" type="editorial">
                     <persName ref="https://megadigital.bbaw.de/M0004276 http://d-nb.info/gnd/116641606">Anselm Salomon Freiherr von
                                Rothschild</persName>.</note>, General von <persName ref="https://megadigital.bbaw.de/M0002693 http://d-nb.info/gnd/118716042">Gablenz</persName> and the devil knows who all. The
                    enormous capital has been voted, and in a few months his waggon will go from
                    Paris to Marseille and back at a rate of 40 miles an hour, without steam or any
                    other motive power but the <hi rendition="#u">waggons own weight</hi>. His
                    invention applicated on the fly-wheel of an ordinary steam engine, gives 80%
                    economy in power. A steam engine of 4 <expan>hors<ex>e</ex>
               </expan> for example,
                    he can make by an application of his invention to make
                        20 <expan>hors<ex>e</ex>
               </expan> without a pennyworth more coals. However
                    this is nothing, as the steamengines will be done away with all together. Up to
                    now: augmentation of weight, was <hi rendition="#u">augmentation</hi> of
                    friction. He upsets all and prooves, in spite of all the proud Chorophees of
                    Knowledge that, if things are in the right condition: augmentation of weight is
                    impossible without <hi rendition="#u">diminution</hi> of friction. This is the
                    great basis on which his invention reposes. The good man has great difficulties
                    to fight with. He finds bad will every where. A thing which must cause such an
                    enormous “deplacement de richesse” is not likely to find many friend. I could
                    write much more about it. If you will <expan>beli<ex>e</ex>ve</expan> me, that I
                    am not out of mind, and you feel interested in it, I shall write more about the
                    progress of it. I consider the man a great genius, and those that will lend
                    hands to bring it to life, as very useful members of society. He finds the
                    greatest opposition in the “haute bourgeoisie”. <ref xml:id="a85bef72-e90f-4615-9bef-72e90f161521" corresp="#c4f62e6b-42dc-4945-b62e-6b42dc094516" type="editorialNote">
                     <anchor type="verweisziel" xml:id="start_t4y_3mv_4z"/>The
                            same M. <persName ref="https://megadigital.bbaw.de/M0004465">Rebour</persName>, assures me—but
                            the matter shall not yet be talked of, as he has since the London
                            affairs some reason to be careful—that he is able to separate hydrogene
                            from oxigene in a way that costs 2 sous par jour for a fire to melt iron
                            with. I think the man to be of also sound mind, honest and very
                            intelligent as much as I know now of him.<anchor type="verweisziel" xml:id="stop_t4y_3mv_4z"/>
                  </ref><note xml:id="c4f62e6b-42dc-4945-b62e-6b42dc094516" corresp="#a85bef72-e90f-4615-9bef-72e90f161521" type="editorial">Diese Stelle erwähnt <ref target="https://megadigital.bbaw.de/M0000082/start_fmt_sjf_4z">Marx im Brief an Engels vom
                                2. April 1866</ref>
                     .</note>
                    I think in such a baffling case as this, this testimonial is not
                            <expan>superfl<ex>u</ex>ous</expan>. I may be wrong, as so many mortals
                    have been wrong before, but I doubt it strongly. I am not entousiaste. I pray
                    you—dont <expan>beli<ex>e</ex>ve</expan> a word of all that, I dont like people
                    that <expan>beli<ex>e</ex>ve</expan> before they see and <hi rendition="#u">understand.</hi> Let me hear soon something of you.</p>
            <closer>
               <signed>My earnest love to all of
                    you.<lb/>Ch. Kaub</signed>
            </closer>
         </div>
      </body></text>
</TEI>